Alexander Hult

Read this first

When clearly superior solutions don’t work

If one takes a rational, long-term glance at our society, there’s a lot of things that should be more prevalent, such as renewable energy-based technology and decentralized blockchain technology. Despite the Silicon Valley hype (and funding), our society rarely embraces these technologies.

The clear argument for an idea, based on a technology, is whether there’s a 1) immediate and 2) definite increase in utility, large enough to negate the cost of switching. This is as opposed to 1) future and 2) hypothetical.

Too many ideas focus on the premise that consumers will switch to something for a future benefit that isn’t even certain to occur. Such ideas include: end-to-end encrypted messaging, in which the government and/or hackers are unable to spy on your communications; a decentralized Facebook, in which your data won’t be aggregated nor sold;
solar panels on your home, in which you’ll...

Continue reading →


College 2: Analyzing Its Value To Create An Alternative

Part I can be read here.

It’s commonly stated that a bachelor’s degree will, on average, increase your lifetime earnings by ~$1m. It’s useful to ask, however, what parts of college make graduates worth that extra $1m to employers. Some aspects are core to the graduate’s economic value, but many certainly aren’t — colleges are full of students who would gladly live without some facilities, events, or initiatives if it meant lower tuition, and their salary post-graduation would remain unaffected. Those who desire an economically valuable education can end up paying $70k for luxuries they hardly want, as every respected academic institution seems to raise tuition to provide these; none choose to forego excess in favor of economically useful stuff.

The purpose of this post is to design a more cost-efficient alternative to the traditional college, with a clear goal in mind: produce skilled...

Continue reading →


College 1: Regulated Purchase, Unregulated Price

This post is meant to convey the problem with financial initiatives intended to make college affordable.

The statistics of the United States’ higher education system and the toll it takes on the country is staggering. 13.8% of Americans currently owe money on student loans, totaling $1.41 trillion in debt. In the past decade alone, college tuition & fees have increased 63%. It would likely take over $70 billion per year to implement free public college in the United States, which is a daunting figure.

Health insurance sets an example as to why college affordability won’t be so simple.

As a result of low consumer price sensitivity, there seems to be a repeating concept within the U.S. of what is arguably the worst combination of regulation. The healthcare system is a prime example at a level easily observed within policy (as opposed to social factors); the government necessitates...

Continue reading →